Can Intergenerational Connection Heal Us? A Critical Essay on CoGenerate’s Call to Action

 

The issue of social isolation and loneliness has emerged as a pressing public health crisis in recent years, affecting not only older adults but also younger generations.

 In their April 2025 report, Can Intergenerational Connection Heal Us, CoGenerate explores the potential of community-based organizations to address this challenge by intentionally fostering sustained, meaningful interactions between younger and older participants.

With interviews of 41 stakeholders and a community-of-practice involving 167 organizations serving more than 230,000 people across eight countries and 30 US states (plus Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C.), the report establishes a data-driven and deeply human narrative. It distills nine key findings, personal stories and voices, and five actionable recommendations.

Context & Importance

Loneliness and social isolation have devastating consequences—heightening risks of heart disease, stroke, depression, dementia, and premature death. They also fuel societal woes: polarization, addiction, and violence. Historically, civic institutions—from charities to religious bodies—used to foster intergenerational bonding. However, decline in civic engagement, reduced social infrastructure, and digital lifestyles have frayed opportunities for connection.

CoGenerate’s approach reframes loneliness not as an individual failing, but a communal design challenge—with solutions emerging from hyper-local, community-rooted organizations. These groups deliberately bring younger and older participants together—not as two passive, lonely groups, but as co‑agents capable of mutual learning, creativity, and transformation.

Nine Key Findings

Drawing on expert interviews, practitioner insights, and member organizations, CoGenerate outlines nine key findings that illustrate why and how intergenerational programs drive connection.

1. Intergenerational connection centers on purpose-driven relationships

These are not fleeting companionship programs, but spaces where individuals—young and old—collaborate in purposeful projects. Those can span dialogues, creative work, mentoring, healing, or advocacy.

“These groups create ways for people to matter to each other – to work, learn, teach and create side by side.” 

Programs emphasizing shared purpose cultivate both meaningful bonds and collective impact—not just social contact.

2. Small, community-rooted organizations are the unsung heroes

CoGenerate found that most of the ~150 programs operate locally, often student-led, volunteer-driven, identity-rooted, and culturally embedded—ranging from a dialogue group for LGBTQ+ participants in Chicago to an intergenerational orchestra in Los Angeles.

These community-based models feel authentic, nimble, and deeply relational, well suited to the nuanced needs of loneliness reduction.

3. Activities weave narrative, creativity, and cultural exchange

Intergenerational activities in the report include bi-weekly creative dialogues, music ensembles, storytelling, and healing rituals.

Participants like Judi in the Chapman University dance project discuss Holocaust memories through movement, creating deep emotional resonance and mutual respect across generations.

4. Quantifiable health and wellbeing benefits

Research shows intergenerational friendships boost mental, cognitive, and physical health—especially among older adults. For example:

• A Johns Hopkins study found that tutoring students led older adults to improved brain and cognitive function.
• Volunteer participation was linked to better self-rated health, mobility, life satisfaction, and longer life.
• Harvard’s generativity study found those investing in younger generations were three times likelier to report high happiness.

While CoGenerate focuses more on stories and program roles, these health benefits reinforce the importance of implementation.

5. Programs transcend single-issue silos

Effective programs blend goals—mental health, art, storytelling, activism, education, housing. For example:

• Fresno Economic Opportunities Commission’s wellness pilot integrates students and AmeriCorps Seniors teaching emotional literacy to youth.
• Home-sharing models link college students with elder hosts, solving housing insecurity and social isolation simultaneously.

This multifaceted design broadens appeal and results in more resilient community ecosystems.

6. Intergenerational work challenges cultural barriers and age stereotypes

Customized program design fosters authentic inclusion. Generations United’s DEI initiative promotes culturally rooted spaces—such as Indigenous gardening in Reno, WA projects working with tribal elders, and LA storytelling across languages and cultures.

These deeply contextual approaches confront implicit bias and build inclusive community identity and equity.

7. Proximity and shared space matter

Physical or virtual proximity—such as shared findings on campuses, nursing homes, schools, and virtual gathering spaces—makes a big difference . Shared spaces provide daily organic connection, while virtual platforms, like Eldera’s global village, extend geographic reach.

8. Programs foster shared identity and interdependence

Participants report “mutual recognition” across age divides—common interests, values, empathy . These bonds enrich lives and reduce social inequity by dismantling stereotypes and building solidarity.

9. Connectivity breeds positive spillovers

The ripple effects extend beyond direct participants: families, schools, neighborhoods benefit. Co-generated op-eds, youth climate activism, shared public art—these initiatives create multi-layered societal impact.

Voices & Profiles

The report foregrounds many individuals whose lives exemplify the power of intergenerational connection.

• LGBTQ+ Intergenerational Dialogue Project (Chicago): College-aged students and older LGBTQ+ individuals meet for a year of themed reflective and creative sessions.
• Heart of L.A. Intergenerational Orchestra (Los Angeles): Musicians from teenagers to seniors share music-making and deep community bonds.
• The Learning Tree (Indianapolis): Neighbors of all ages share talents, stories, and build local social capital.
• Perfect Pair: Students across 22 campuses mentor older adults to enhance health and mutual connection.
• SeekHealing (North Carolina): Groups co‑create healing spaces to address trauma, loneliness, and addiction across generations.

Five Recommendations for Practitioners, Funders, and Policymakers

CoGenerate concludes with five recommendations to cultivate broader launch, adoption, scaling, and policy supports for intergenerational connection work:

1. Center shared purpose, not programs
   Programs must be driven by meaningful shared work—creative, civic, therapeutic—not always structured companionship.
2. Shine a spotlight on community-led efforts
   National strategies must recognize and nurture smaller, hyper-local organizations—they are authentic, adaptive, and relational.
3. Invest in cultural and demographic inclusion
   Effective programs reflect participants’ cultures, languages, and lived experiences. DEI must be intentional and built in.
4. Support infrastructure, collaboration, and capacity
   Funders and governments should invest in backbone infrastructure, training, evaluation, and peer-learning networks to scale place-based efforts.
5. Drive collective impact through policy alignment
   Embed intergenerational connection into health, housing, education, and civic policies—create social prescribing, co-housing, campus‑ elder shared sites, and umbrella funding mechanisms.

These recommendations seek to embed intergenerational connection into community ecosystems—within philanthropic, civic, and governmental frameworks—beyond one-off programming .

Analysis & Implications

1. A public health response with roots in social design
   Loneliness is health-harming. Programs are local public health interventions—preventive, community-based, and scalable.
2. Humanity over digitalization
   In an era dominated by digital pro-sociality, embodied cross‑age interaction reminds us of the irreplaceable value of presence, narrative, and creative collaboration.
3. Culture-centered, not cookie-cutter
   Effectiveness lies in customizing design—be it Indigenous gardening, LGBTQ+ storytelling, intergenerational orchestras, or student-living collaborations. This is principle‑over-program, not replication by rote.
4. Beyond service: co-authorship
   Participants are co‑authors, not recipients. Projects foster dignity, empowerment, and agency across generational lines.
5. Toward systems change
   Linking individual projects to funding ecosystems, policy frameworks, and integrating them into schools, universities, senior housing and mental health systems magnifies impact—and lends sustainability.

Conclusion

"Can Intergenerational Connection Heal Us?" offers a timely and urgent blueprint for combatting loneliness: through creative, civic, culturally authentic bonds between generations hosted by local, community-rooted organizations. By framing participants as actors shaping the social landscape, not mere beneficiaries, the report injects dignity, purpose, and renewed connection into community life. 

Its nine findings detail: the value of purpose-driven collaboration, small‑scale authenticity, creativity, quantifiable health benefits, multi-purpose design, cultural inclusion, proximity, shared identity, and integrative ripple effects. The five recommendations push practitioners, funders, and policymakers toward purposeful, culturally informed, and systems-enabled intergenerational work.

In a time when loneliness and social fragmentation threaten mental and physical wellbeing, this report reclaims connection as a social architecture. It invites us to redesign community life—through shared purpose, storytelling, creativity, mentorship, and mutual care. When we build spaces for young people to learn from elders—and elders to invest their narratives, energy, and cultural knowledge—we bridge isolation, build empathy, and reclaim community resilience.

In this study we discover that healing from loneliness isn’t a medical fix—it’s a collective redesign. It’s about aligning our civic infrastructure, cultural habits, funding flows, and policies around the simple strategy of generations teaching, loving, working, and healing together. For this profoundly relational work is not just a prescription—it’s the medicine.

 

Written by David L. Burton

MORE INFORMATION

Take the Engaged Neighbor pledge and become part of a movement! The pledge outlines five categories and 20 principles to guide you toward becoming an engaged neighbor. Sign the pledge at https://nomoregoodneighbors.com. Individuals who take the pledge do get special invitations to future events online and in person. Contact the blog author, David L. Burton via emal at dburton541@yahoo.com.